- Therion - speleo.sk

FW: Duff address
by Bruce 04 Dec '13

04 Dec '13

>>Every message to the list (that I send, and I presume it's the same >>for everyone else), gets this bounce. >Nope. I have never received this Cancel that. I did just now!! "Your message was addressed to a nonexistent recipient." for <jranaya(a)rentec.com>; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:56:32 -0400 Bruce

3 2

Re: [Therion] Therion et al on Win 7 or 8.1
by Graham Mullan 04 Dec '13

04 Dec '13

I have been running Notepad++, Therion, Survex, PocketTopo, Topparser and Adobe pdf readers on W7 for several years. The only problems I have had are with Aven & that's down to that program not W7. I have never had a problem with Xtherion not recognising thconfig files without a name extension. I have run all of them under W8 as well, without issues, but haven't done so since the W8.1 free upgrade happened last week, so I'll not comment on that. Graham

1 0

equate to non-existant station does not raise error
by Bruce 02 Dec '13

02 Dec '13

This may have been raised before. If a typing error is made in a station equate statement, no error is raised. For example in the following station kb51.29@kb does not exist, therefore the loop is not closed as the user intended. equate kb51.29@kb kb51.29@57 Can an error be raised in this circumstance please. Regards Bruce Mutton

5 6

pocketopo
by Christos Pennos 15 Nov '13

15 Nov '13

hi guys, first of all I apologize for the off topic question but…does anyone managed to use pocketopo on a mac using wine or something similar? Thanks Chris

3 2

Re: [Therion] Therion Digest, Vol 95, Issue 2
by Christos Pennos 15 Nov '13

15 Nov '13

Yes, I know that since with vmware you make a virtual windows machine… with wine.. is different you can run the .exe ‘directly’ on your mac, no need of windows installation… Chris On 15 Νοε 2013, at 2:35 μ.μ., therion-request(a)speleo.sk wrote: > Send Therion mailing list submissions to > therion(a)speleo.sk > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mailman.speleo.sk/mailman/listinfo/therion > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > therion-request(a)speleo.sk > > You can reach the person managing the list at > therion-owner(a)speleo.sk > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Therion digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. pocketopo (Christos Pennos) > 2. Re: pocketopo (Charles Ghommidh) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:39:23 +0100 > From: Christos Pennos <pennos4(a)hotmail.com> > Subject: [Therion] pocketopo > To: therion(a)speleo.sk > Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP3434A5FBA9EDC2095D4E87FF2FB0(a)phx.gbl> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > > hi guys, > first of all I apologize for the off topic question > but?does anyone managed to use pocketopo on a mac using wine or something similar? > Thanks > > Chris > >

1 0

FW: Colouring by altitude
by Graham Mullan 31 Oct '13

31 Oct '13

Olly and Marco are right, of course, that consistent colouring between plan and elevation does help in visualising the correspondemce between different parts of the cave. This does not *need* to be by elevation (although that can sometimes be useful) and indeed that might even cause confusion where separate parts of the cave are at the same elevation. We colour by map, which is a reasonable proxy for doing so by passage. The problem is that there is not, as far as I am aware, any method of directly choosing the colours, as Therion does that for you. That makes it important to list individual components the same way in both plan and elevation and that is not always possible. The best answer would be to allow colour choice, so that the individual draughtsman can choose exactly how he wishes to display his drawing. I, of course, have no idea at all as to how easy it would be to implement this. Graham

3 2

Re: [Therion] Colouring by altitude
by Graham Mullan 31 Oct '13

31 Oct '13

Olly and Marco are right, of course, that consistent colouring between plan and elevation does help in visualising the correspondemce between different parts of the cave. This does not *need* to be by elevation (although that can sometimes be useful) and indeed that might even cause confusion where separate parts of the cave are at the same elevation. We colour by map, which is a reasonable proxy for doing so by passage. The problem is that there is not, as far as I am aware, any method of directly choosing the colours, as Therion does that for you. That makes it important to list individual components the same way in both plan and elevation and that is not always possible. The best answer would be to allow colour choice, so that the individual draughtsman can choose exactly how he wishes to display his drawing. I, of course, have no idea at all as to how easy it would be to implement this. Graham

1 0

Re: [Therion] Therion Digest, Vol 94, Issue 23 extended section colored by altitude
by Dave Clucas 30 Oct '13

30 Oct '13

> Subject: [Therion] extended section colored by altitude > To: therion(a)speleo.sk > Message-ID: > <1382891575.29328.BPMail_high_noncarrier(a)web120301.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > marco menchise asked me why extended sections do not come colored by altitide. > indeed coloring ext. sectiion by altitude (or depth) would make sense to me ... > tried with 5.3.11 and they come white. > looked at the source, and the Z coord that it used to color by altitude is set to 0 for the extended section. > any reason why? > marco > Surely the reason is you don't need it. The passage at top of the page is high and the passage at the bottom is low. If the colours were used on a section it would be reasonable to assume that the colours would indicate which passages lay behind other passages but this couldn't apply to an extended section as passages are stretched out along the line of the projection. Dave Clucas daveclucas.com mycaves.org. daveclucas(a)icloud.com

3 2

Therion Digest, Vol 94, Issue 23
by Dave Clucas 30 Oct '13

30 Oct '13

> Subject: [Therion] extended section colored by altitude > To: therion(a)speleo.sk > Message-ID: > <1382891575.29328.BPMail_high_noncarrier(a)web120301.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > marco menchise asked me why extended sections do not come colored by altitide. > indeed coloring ext. sectiion by altitude (or depth) would make sense to me ... > tried with 5.3.11 and they come white. > looked at the source, and the Z coord that it used to color by altitude is set to 0 for the extended section. > any reason why? > marco > Surely the reason is you don't need it. The passage at top of the page is high and the passage at the bottom is low. If the colours were used on a section it would be reasonable to assume that the colours would indicate which passages lay behind other passages but this couldn't apply to an extended section as passages are stretched out along the line of the projection. Dave Clucas daveclucas.com mycaves.org. daveclucas(a)icloud.com

1 0

extended section colored by altitude
by Marco Corvi 29 Oct '13

29 Oct '13

marco menchise asked me why extended sections do not come colored by altitide. indeed coloring ext. sectiion by altitude (or depth) would make sense to me ... tried with 5.3.11 and they come white. looked at the source, and the Z coord that it used to color by altitude is set to 0 for the extended section. any reason why? marco

2 1