hello, I noticed you prepared a new beta release of therion. I download and tried the windows delivery. I noticed that the bug on the 3 D view (tool loch) for the pit view is still present. I sent you and email a few month ago with an exemple (the data put in the survey giving the dept or hight value in a vertical survey (a pit) is used in the 3D modele as the width of the pit. So the pit seems always to be very large at the top and at his bottom). An other problem I noticed in the release 0.5.1 (but not test in the beta) his : for the loch tool, on a Linux computer (Ubuntu), with a 3D view (the same data used on windows), I can't have a color of the galery by deep. Colors are random. But the colors are good in the Windows release. Do you know this problem ? Will you solve these problems on the final 0.5.2 delivery or later ? Thanks, Gilbert
I noticed that the bug on the 3 D view (tool loch) for the pit view is still present. I sent you and email a few month ago with an exemple (the data put in the survey giving the dept or hight value in a vertical survey (a pit) is used in the 3D modele as the width of the pit. So the pit seems always to be very large at the top and at his bottom)
I remember - but as far as I remember, I have also answered you on 24-01-2008. Now I am not sure, whether you have received my answer. In any case - it is attached below. And my problem is, I do not understand your problem :) I am sorry - could you please draw it more in details? Thanks.
for the loch tool, on a Linux computer (Ubuntu), with a 3D view (the same data used on windows), I can't have a color of the galery by deep. Colors are random. But the colors are good in the Windows release. Do you know this problem ?
Yes, in the latest snapshot - this should be already fixed. Regards, S. P.S. Attached my answer to your previous e-mail: I am sorry for late answer, but sometimes it takes me a long time to get to the answers. I have tried the files you have submitted, but without success - I am not sure what is wrong on the image. OK, the interpretation of LRUD according to therion is following (we should probably put this into thbook): If passeges are horizontal (inclination < vthreshold, that can be set in centerline), LR is perpendicular to the shot and UD is vertical. If passages are more or less vertical (inclination > vthreshold), even UD becomes perpendicular to the shot - otherwise passages would not look very good. In the case of vertical (+- 90), UD is interpreted as north-south dimension from the station - to allow tube-like modelling of verticals. In your example - everything seems to me plotted correctly. Do I understand something wrong? Thanks, S. Quoting "Gilbert Fernandes (mailinglist)" <gfe_list@aliceadsl.fr>:
Hello,
I notice a bug in the 3D modeling. In this short exemple you can reproduce the error. The main problem is when you have a pit, ans so a vertical survey ( compas = 90 or -90 ), the up and down value in survey data is used in the 3D model (.lox file) for the with of the pit and not for the hight (or down) of the galery. So pits are always as fat as they are hight. Look the .th file and try to change the up and down value as comment in the exemple, look the effect in the 3D view. Thanks,
Gilbert
OK, thanks, I had missed your answer or never receive it. Thanks for the reply. I understand what you mean for the LRUD data. I had an other definition, that's why I thought there was a bug. I'll change my data to match your requirement. Thanks, Thanks for your great job ! Gilbert Stacho Mudrak a écrit :
I noticed that the bug on the 3 D view (tool loch) for the pit view is still present. I sent you and email a few month ago with an exemple (the data put in the survey giving the dept or hight value in a vertical survey (a pit) is used in the 3D modele as the width of the pit. So the pit seems always to be very large at the top and at his bottom)
I remember - but as far as I remember, I have also answered you on 24-01-2008. Now I am not sure, whether you have received my answer. In any case - it is attached below. And my problem is, I do not understand your problem :) I am sorry - could you please draw it more in details? Thanks.
for the loch tool, on a Linux computer (Ubuntu), with a 3D view (the same data used on windows), I can't have a color of the galery by deep. Colors are random. But the colors are good in the Windows release. Do you know this problem ?
Yes, in the latest snapshot - this should be already fixed.
Regards, S.
P.S. Attached my answer to your previous e-mail:
I am sorry for late answer, but sometimes it takes me a long time to get to the answers. I have tried the files you have submitted, but without success - I am not sure what is wrong on the image.
OK, the interpretation of LRUD according to therion is following (we should probably put this into thbook):
If passeges are horizontal (inclination < vthreshold, that can be set in centerline), LR is perpendicular to the shot and UD is vertical.
If passages are more or less vertical (inclination > vthreshold), even UD becomes perpendicular to the shot - otherwise passages would not look very good. In the case of vertical (+- 90), UD is interpreted as north-south dimension from the station - to allow tube-like modelling of verticals. In your example - everything seems to me plotted correctly.
Do I understand something wrong?
Thanks, S.
Quoting "Gilbert Fernandes (mailinglist)" <gfe_list@aliceadsl.fr>:
Hello,
I notice a bug in the 3D modeling. In this short exemple you can reproduce the error. The main problem is when you have a pit, ans so a vertical survey ( compas = 90 or -90 ), the up and down value in survey data is used in the 3D model (.lox file) for the with of the pit and not for the hight (or down) of the galery. So pits are always as fat as they are hight. Look the .th file and try to change the up and down value as comment in the exemple, look the effect in the 3D view. Thanks,
Gilbert
_______________________________________________ Therion mailing list Therion@speleo.sk http://www.speleo.sk/mailman/listinfo/therion
participants (4)
-
Christian Rößler (Roessler) -
Gilbert Fernandes (mailinglist) -
Jonathan Prouty -
Stacho Mudrak