On 11.1.2009, at 21:08, Bruce Mutton wrote:
For example, the code below gives a ? on a 2d map, but does not appear in the continuation-list.
point 123.0 456.0 continuation
change it to point 123.0 456.0 continuation -text "something"
Quite easy to do it in plain text editor by search/replace.
Also I wonder if the object that contains the continuation definition could be listed, ie the scrap or survey (or file name), so that edits are easier to locate.
(At present the survey that identifies the physical location is listed - regardless of where it's code is defined - and this is useful and should be retained)
generate map or atlas with next options in layout:
debug station-names survey-level 1
and you may use the search feature of Acrobat: search "station_name@survey_name"
m.s.
Thanks Martin I have been using both those approaches as work-arounds for some time, but the work-arounds are only of use if you know there is a continuation in your data that has no text associated with it. Ie if you don't actually do the search with the text editor in all your *.th and *.th2 files there are no visual cues. A particular problem if you are checking data created by someone else. It should be sufficient to export a continuation-list to find this type of anomaly in the input data. Thoughts anyone? Bruce