1 Mar
2004
1 Mar
'04
1:30 p.m.
join fsceil1@river:0 farsidewest3@river:7
That's actually a rather odd syntax don't you think? The syntax in thbook seems rather more sensible to me (with the smaller parts to the left). Thinking about it 0:fsceil1@river would actually be the most logical, but somehow that doesn't seem as clear as fsceil1:0@river
If we take 'fsceil1@river' as a full-ID, then the current syntax means <full-id>:<mark>, which is odd, but consistent -- isn't it? Martin