[Therion] Экспорт в KML - export cave-list html and kml
Владимир Георгиев
vld.georgiev at gmail.com
Sun Jan 28 07:53:50 CET 2018
Bruce
Very good test and illustrations. You are my Therion guru :)
Using both markings seems to be a good way to separate the "cave" (main
entrance marked on the survey command) from the secondary entrances (marked
with station commands), and to switch the secondary ones on/off in the
lists.
Btw, if you use -surveys off it hides the entrances, but only if you have
defined a "cave main entrance" in the survey. If there is no main entrance,
it still shows all the secondary ones defined with station.
Would you have the time to put your description and screenshots in the
wiki? This is good information have.
Vlad
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 4:45 AM, Bruce Mutton via Therion <therion at speleo.sk
> wrote:
> Sorry С уважением, I may have taken over your post!
>
>
>
> > I suspect the kml exports are not reporting the hierarchy however.
>
> I was wrong, export cave-list -fmt kml does report the full hierarchy, and
> may even behave better than the html output.
>
> But it is a bit complicated – I did some testing…
>
>
>
> Using this general form of survey definition…
>
> survey 01 -title “Some Cave name” -entrance 1
>
> #defining the entrance here as part of survey definition tells Therion ‘it
> is a cave’
>
> centerline
> cs lat-long
> fix 0 11:22:33.4 22:33:44.5 1234 # set the GPS coordinates and
> elevation of station 0
> station 3 "Some other entrance name" entrance
>
> # Mark station 3 as another entrance of ‘Some Cave name’ cave, and
> display it’s name also
>
> …
>
> endcenterline
>
> endsurvey
>
>
>
> And using these exports….
>
>
>
> *#**html*
>
> export cave-list \
>
> -surveys on \ # on = show survey, cave hierarchy, & entrances so long
> as location is on,
>
> # off = show caves only, not entrances, no hierarchy
>
> -location on \ # on = show cave coords, and entrance coordinates only
> if surveys are on
>
> # off = no coordinates
>
> -output ./Output/RiwakaSystemCaves.*html*
>
>
>
> *#**kml*
>
> export cave-list \
>
> -surveys on \ # on = show survey, cave & entrances hierarchy
>
> # off = show caves only, not entrances, no hierarchy
>
> -location on \ # on|off = no difference
>
> -output ./Output/RiwakaSystemCaves.*kml*
>
>
>
> Some examples using variations of the above. In outputs below there are
> four caves explicitly defined; H-Hawkes Cave, Hawkes Kairuru Middle Cave,
> Kairuru Cave, Kairuru 3030. And one cave that Therion has deduced as it is
> implied by the survey structure; Ngarua cave, Takaka Hill. (Unfortunately
> I have not been disciplined with naming, so apologies that it is
> confusing).
>
>
>
> “Kairuru 3030” is defined as a cave, and it has two entrances defined in
> the centrelines (that are therefore part of Kairuru 3030 Cave, which has
> three entrances in total).
>
> It is one of many caves in a Therion project that the outputs below are
> taken from.
>
> Here the word ‘cave’ is used to mean the main entrance (ie ‘cave’ is an
> entrance and a cave, whereas ‘entrance’ is just an entrance that is usually
> a part of an already defined cave).
>
>
>
> *HTML Outputs*
>
>
>
> *Html surveys on location on* (the survey, cave and entrance hierarchy is
> shown. Caves have a length reported, entrances do not)
>
>
>
> *Html surveys on location off* (the survey and cave hierarchy is shown,
> but *not entrances**. Caves have a length reported, entrances do not)
>
> * Could this be a bug? Maybe, maybe not.
>
> The last two records ARE entrances, but they have no survey legs
> associated, they are gps fixes only. Maybe that is why Therion treats them
> differently and displays these but not others.
>
> Therion has used the survey hierarchy to infer it is a cave called “Ngarua
> Cave, Takaka Hill” even though there is no cave entrance defined in the
> survey definition.
>
>
>
> *Html surveys off location on *(No hierarchy, caves only, no entrances –
> except fixed entrances, has coordinates columns)
>
> *Html surveys off location off *(No hierarchy, caves only, no entrances –
> except fixed entrances, no coordinates)
>
>
>
> *KML Outputs*
>
>
>
> *Kml surveys on location on *(the survey, cave and entrance hierarchy is
> shown. Does not distinguish bottom level records as either cave or
> entrance, could be either)
>
> *Kml surveys on location off* (same)
>
>
>
> *Kml surveys off location on, *
>
> *Kml surveys off location off* (both look the same, both contain
> coordinates - kml would be boring without locations!)
>
>
>
> Hope that helps :)
>
> Bruce
>
>
>
> *From:* Bruce Mutton [mailto:bruce at tomo.co.nz]
> *Sent:* Sunday, 28 January 2018 11:58 AM
> *To:* List for Therion users <therion at speleo.sk>
> *Subject:* Re: [Therion] Экспорт в KML
>
>
>
> Yes it does make a difference. Define a cave with the survey definition.
> Define secondary entrances within centrelines.
>
> See the difference if you export caves to a html file. For best effect you
> can do this for a multi cave project where each cave has multiple
> entrances. I will post example outputs later.
>
> I suspect the kml exports are not reporting the hierachy however.
>
>
>
> Bruce
>
>
>
> Sent from my Samsung device, hence the typo's
>
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Владимир Георгиев via Therion <therion at speleo.sk>
> Date: 28/01/18 10:16 (GMT+12:00)
> To: List for Therion users <therion at speleo.sk>
> Cc: Владимир Георгиев <vld.georgiev at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Therion] Экспорт в KML
>
> Bruce
>
> Yes, that's right, you can define any number of entrances like this.
> Although I admit I haven't used the "survey 01 -title “Some Cave name”
> -entrance 1" syntax. So far I have always listed the entrances within the
> surveys with several "station XX "Some other entrance name" entrance"
> lines.
>
>
> Does it make a difference which syntax is used?
>
> Vlad
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 11:01 PM, Bruce Mutton via Therion <
> therion at speleo.sk> wrote:
>
> And I have no Russian, but making assumptions based on Vladimir’s response…
>
> (and apologising for using English)
>
>
>
> There are more subtle nuances that can be conveyed.
>
> Have a look at https://therion.speleo.sk/wiki/drawingchecklist?s[]=
> entrance#points and scroll down to ‘Passage Ends’ point entrance.
>
> You can tell Therion to define a cave, and further, specifically define
> all the entrances that the ‘cave’ has.
>
>
>
> To expand on and change Vladimir’s example
>
>
>
> survey 01 -title “Some Cave name” -entrance 1
>
> #defining the entrance here as part of survey definition tells Therion ‘it
> is a cave’
>
> centerline
> cs lat-long
> fix 0 11:22:33.4 22:33:44.5 1234 # set the GPS coordinates and
> elevation of station 0
> station 3 "Some other entrance name" entrance
>
> # Mark station 3 as another entrance of ‘Some Cave name’ cave, and
> display it’s name also
>
> …
>
> endcenterline
>
> endsurvey
>
> Have I got that right Vlad?
>
> Bruce
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Therion [mailto:therion-bounces at speleo.sk] *On Behalf Of *????????
> ???????? via Therion
> *Sent:* Sunday, 28 January 2018 7:18 AM
> *To:* List for Therion users <therion at speleo.sk>
> *Cc:* Владимир Георгиев <vld.georgiev at gmail.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [Therion] Экспорт в KML
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> My Russian is not that good, so I will reply in English.
>
> The kml model can export the entrances, if that is what you mean by
> "объектов". To get the name of the cave to display, you have to mark one or
> more stations as entrances. Something like this:
>
> centerline
> cs lat-long
> fix 0 11:22:33.4 22:33:44.5 1234 # set the GPS coordinates and
> elevation of station 0
> station 0 "Some cave name" entrance # Mark station 0 as an entrance
> and set the name to be displayed. Not necessarily the same station as the
> one with the coords.
> ...
>
> Vladimir
>
>
>
>
>
> 2018-01-26 11:08 GMT+02:00 Кунгурская лаборатория-стационар via Therion <
> therion at speleo.sk>:
>
> Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста. Я пытаюсь экспортировать данные
> в KML-файл. Вот строка
>
> export model -fmt kml -output Kungur_Z.kml
>
> При просмотре kml-файла он не отображает названия объектов, а
> отображаются только линии.
>
> Подскажите, пожалуйста, как сделать так, чтобы названия объектов тоже
> отображались?
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Therion mailing list
> Therion at speleo.sk
> https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Therion mailing list
> Therion at speleo.sk
> https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.speleo.sk/pipermail/therion/attachments/20180128/81324a92/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 7765 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.speleo.sk/pipermail/therion/attachments/20180128/81324a92/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 13496 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.speleo.sk/pipermail/therion/attachments/20180128/81324a92/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 17148 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.speleo.sk/pipermail/therion/attachments/20180128/81324a92/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 19688 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.speleo.sk/pipermail/therion/attachments/20180128/81324a92/attachment-0003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6915 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.speleo.sk/pipermail/therion/attachments/20180128/81324a92/attachment-0004.png>
More information about the Therion
mailing list