"ignoreall" is getting ignored
Hi, I had today the problem that I had incomplete LRUD data in my files and I thought I could ignore that by adding "ignoreall" in the definition of the survey data. But therion complained about incomplete data. Is that behaviour as it should be? Regards Wolfgang
On 21.5.2008, at 21:48, Wolfgang Zillig wrote:
I had today the problem that I had incomplete LRUD data in my files and I thought I could ignore that by adding "ignoreall" in the definition of the survey data. But therion complained about incomplete data. Is that behaviour as it should be?
Use dash for incomplete LRUD data or change the definition of data. data normal from to compass clino length left right up down 1 2 15 -5 4 1 2 3 0 2 3 30 5 2,5 - - - - or (this is more correct) data normal from to compass clino length left right up down 1 2 15 -5 4 1 2 3 0 data normal from to compass clino length 2 3 30 5 2,5 data normal from to compass clino length left right up down Martin
As an aside to the post below, and from the perspective of data organisation... I started my Therion 'life' using the 'more correct' syntax below, and ended up with data files about as difficult to read, and hard to check against field notes (which have offset lines to distinguish between leg data and point LRUD data) This syntax blurs the distinction between LRUD for the 'from' station and the 'to' station, compounded by the Therion convention of defaulting to the 'to' station unlike other software (typically American) common in New Zealand. Luckily, as it turns out, not knowing about the '-' option meant that I settled on an approach that completely separates the two dimensional leg data from the somewhat one dimensional point LRUD data. This has turned out to be much easier to enter, check and correct, and looks much tidier. The small amount of extra typing is well worth it, and for that matter, Therion does most of the extra 'typing' for you. For example... #Survey Legs #----------- data normal from to tape compass clino F38 F39 5 245 -25 F39 F40 3.5 195 -5 F40 F41 4.4 236 0 F41 F42 8.1 205 3 #Passage Dimensions #------------------ data dimensions station right left up down F38 2 1 10 3.5 F39 1 2 10 3 F710 3 2 1 0 F41 0.5 1 1.5 1 F42 1.5 2 2.5 3 Having said all that, it's nice that Therion has lots of flexibility and really good to know about the - to leave the data unspecified. (Presumably it gives better results than setting the values to zero?) Regards Bruce -----Original Message----- From: therion-bounces@speleo.sk [mailto:therion-bounces@speleo.sk] On Behalf Of Martin Sluka Sent: Thursday, 22 May 2008 6:08 p.m. To: therion@speleo.sk Subject: Re: [Therion] "ignoreall" is getting ignored ...
behaviour as it should be?
Use dash for incomplete LRUD data or change the definition of data. data normal from to compass clino length left right up down 1 2 15 -5 4 1 2 3 0 2 3 30 5 2,5 - - - - or (this is more correct) data normal from to compass clino length left right up down 1 2 15 -5 4 1 2 3 0 data normal from to compass clino length 2 3 30 5 2,5 data normal from to compass clino length left right up down Martin _______________________________________________
On 23.5.2008, at 9:26, Bruce Mutton wrote:
This syntax blurs the distinction between LRUD for the 'from' station and the 'to' station, compounded by the Therion convention of defaulting to the 'to' station unlike other software (typically American) common in New Zealand.
There are minimally two another options: data dimension station down up right left 0 1 3 0 2 and data normal from to compass clino length left up right down 0 1 15 -5 12 [2 1.5] [0 1] [3 2] [1 0] first number in brackets is for "from" and second for "to". Quite useful if narrow passage lead into large room MartinS
No it is not. I will check it - it looks there is some bug. Thanks for pointing out, S. On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Wolfgang Zillig <wolfgang.zillig@web.de> wrote:
Hi, I had today the problem that I had incomplete LRUD data in my files and I thought I could ignore that by adding "ignoreall" in the definition of the survey data. But therion complained about incomplete data. Is that behaviour as it should be? Regards Wolfgang
_______________________________________________ Therion mailing list Therion@speleo.sk http://www.speleo.sk/mailman/listinfo/therion
This is strange, I have tried ignoreall and it worked with my dataset. Could you please send me sample file, where it does not work? Thanks, S. On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Wolfgang Zillig <wolfgang.zillig@web.de> wrote:
Hi, I had today the problem that I had incomplete LRUD data in my files and I thought I could ignore that by adding "ignoreall" in the definition of the survey data. But therion complained about incomplete data. Is that behaviour as it should be? Regards Wolfgang
_______________________________________________ Therion mailing list Therion@speleo.sk http://www.speleo.sk/mailman/listinfo/therion
participants (4)
-
Bruce Mutton -
Martin Sluka -
Stacho Mudrak -
Wolfgang Zillig