Therion encourages drawing s complex junction chamber as one scrap, but that tends to mean that one scrap now has stations fromseveral surveys in it. How shold these be labelled and where in the hierarchy should the files be 'input'?
The chapter Thinking in Therion/How to draw maps in thbooks gives some explanation. It is perhaps written very condensed, but all basic ideas are given.
In general scrapsdon't match to surveys very well at all, but if you don't incldue a .th2 file in the .th file within a survey/endsurvey pair then presumably the station labels need full names not just numbers? I'm not
Exactly, you need full names.
sure when I start drawing whether it will all be one survey so I can just use numbers or if it will be several surveys and I'll need to use full names - and it's a paid to go back afterwards and change them.
Only solution is a Slovak proverb "Think twice, cut once" :)) At the beginning of therion development I suggested to have variable namespaces, e.g. to give all stations in the scrap references like 1@VAR 2@VAR etc. and than define centrally in one place that VAR is actually chamber1.entrance survey. It would be than easy to redefine it. But it seemed to be too much work to implement it.
What is the recommended way to deal with scrap/survey mismatches? Do you have a file for each scrap, put all scraps inthe samesurvye in one file?
See the above mentioned chapter.
And I see therion now gives scraps names automatically, based on the item-number, so you get scraps 1, 36, 90, 109 in your file. I think it would be better if it named the scraps 1, 2, 3, 4 - I'd find that less confusing.
It always used to. I rename all scraps after creation. Martin