I think this is just a matter of terminology. Depth should perhaps read vertical range or denivelation. What you are suggesting would only be valid for a cave with a single entrance. On 14 Mar 2009, at 19:00, therion-request@speleo.sk wrote:
Send Therion mailing list submissions to therion@speleo.sk
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mailman.speleo.sk/mailman/listinfo/therion or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to therion-request@speleo.sk
You can reach the person managing the list at therion-owner@speleo.sk
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Therion digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. depth (Guido Verhoeven)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 11:05:13 +0100 From: Guido Verhoeven <guidonts@hotmail.com> Subject: [Therion] depth To: <therion@speleo.sk> Message-ID: <COL107-W827D86DDC57C9413E58833D69D0@phx.gbl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hello eveyone
I'm new to this list (3 days) and I already saw something that, in my opinion, may be better:
As well on the plan as on the extended elevation there is mentioned 'Depth' followed by the meters between the highest point and the lowest point of the cave. But we have found, for the moment just a little cave, that goes at the entrance down for about 5 meter and then slowly up for about 15 meter. So I believe it would be better that there is: 'Depth: -5 m , + 15 m'.
Thank you
Verhoeven Guido
_________________________________________________________________ Een pauze nodig? Speel een spelletje met je vrienden http://www.messengerbillboard.be/nl/play