On 2007-02-27 22:45 +1100, Mike Lake wrote:
On Tue 27 Feb 2007, Stacho Mudrak wrote:
Quoting Mike Lake <mikel@speleonics.com.au>:
Yes orientaion would be good but just flowstone for now with no orientation would be better than nothing.
In the latest snapshot, area flowstone symbol is now supported.
Thanks !
I have recompiled it and now I see flowstone is listed in xtherion area lists and I can create a flowstone fill. This will keep us going for a while now that we can use this. It means I can now also play around varying the mpost code to for the nicest looking flowstone.
Mike - I have an interest in this too - mulu has large flowstone areas which are currently poorly (artistically) represented. I'd be happy to compare notes. Wookey -- Aleph One Ltd, Bottisham, CAMBRIDGE, CB5 9BA, UK Tel +44 (0) 1223 811679 work: http://www.aleph1.co.uk/ play: http://wookware.org/ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.