Re: [Therion] Breaking a loop at a specific station on extended elevation

On 2019-11-12 07:20 +1300, Bruce Mutton wrote:

I don't have a problem with the characteristic you mention in point 2. I think it is just semantics associated with the word 'ignore', and sequential process. If you think 'break' then is it all OK?

We think it should be possible to specify 'break/ignore' at a point, rather than a point+direction (i.e. a leg/pair of points) We want the computer to worry about the 'direction' aspect, and feel we shouldn't have to. It seems like this should be possible. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/