While looking at extending the current mi: translation I noticed that there may be a lack of consistency with the en: spelling of disc/disk. A table from the current texts.txt shows what we have a present. Therion syntax name en translation therion: point disc-pillar en: disc on pillar therion: point disc-pillars en: discs on pillars therion: point disc-stalactite en: disc on stalactite therion: point disc-stalactites en: discs on stalactites therion: point disc-stalagmite en: disc on stalagmite therion: point disc-stalagmites en: discs on stalagmites therion: point disk en: disk After consulting with a venerable caver who lives nearby, and happens to be a linguist, and checking with a bit of googling myself, it seems to me that 'disk' is favoured by US English and for things like computer disks, and 'disc' is favoured by UK English and for things like plates or ploughing discs. So would there be any objection to changing Therion's texts.txt to include: en: disc. # use disc for generic English translations en_UK: disc. and # use disc for UK English en_US: disk. # use disk for US English in all cases? And another thing. I'm wondering if the current point disk is referring to what are also commonly known as shields? In which case: therion: point disk en: disc, shield might be a better translation for 'point disk'? Bruce