On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 10:59:44PM +0000, Wookey via Therion wrote:
On 2018-11-14 20:36 +0000, Olly Betts via Therion wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 07:07:50PM +0000, Andrew Atkinson via Therion wrote:
I've not had time to play with this, since Alistair showed me the problem on the weekend. The bit that I cannot get my head round is when 3d are imported with a coordinate system, if a th centreline then connects 2 parts of the survey from the 3d or an entrance coordinate is specified for the 3d, how does this change, or can it change the coordinates of the data from the 3d as the stations from this already has coordinates with little information about the connections [I hope that makes sense]
Survex .3d files record the coordinate system the data is in, if one was specified. This was added in Survex 1.2.14 (released 2014-07-05).
Right, and that is metadata saying, effectively, 'the numbers in this file should be considered to be in a co-ordinate system starting at X,Y on the planet, oriented this way'.
That's a bit oversimplified, but gives the right idea.
But looking at the therion source code, it appears therion never makes use of this information. I suspect therion just hasn't been updated for Survex gaining coordinate system support.
You can specify the coordinate system as an option to therion's import command, so for now I guess that's what you have to do.
Right, but (if I understand this correctly), that option does not change the numbers in the file. They must be valid for the cordinate system given in the import command. This info effectively says where the origin for the co-ordinates in the file are to be interpreted-as (and stuff about axis angles). So let's say that your survex data was processed in 'local' co-ordinates so it just starts from 0,0 in arbitrary 'nowhere' co-ordinates.
What Alistair wants to do is read that in, but use it with therion data that is in real-world co-ordinates (UTM30N).
The question is, can that be offset by some arbitrary number on reading-in so that it appears in the right place in the UTM30 co-ordinate system? Is a rotation needed too?
I'd interpreted what Alistair had said as meaning he was specifying the coordinate systems in his Survex data, but re-reading I think you may be right that his data is currently just in arbitrary "local" coordinates. I don't think there's a way to retrofit a coordinate system to processed data in arbitrary local coordinates. Theoretically it could probably be done, though if there are multiple fixed points then you'd probably have to redo the loop closure to make it fit properly (because space isn't exactly the same shape in different coordinate systems - it's not just a translation and a rotation).
The import -calibrate x y z X Y Z command looks like it should do the right thing, so long as the axes are aligned, by shifting from x y z to X Y Z.
Adding on a fixed offset isn't going to correctly map you between most pairs of coordinate systems though, so in general that's a bodge. It may sometimes be good enough given the errors in cave survey measurements, but it seems simpler to just specify the coordinate systems and fixed stations in the Survex data with "*cs" and "*fix", and reprocess (and with current therion, also tell it what coordinate system you used in "*cs out" in the Survex data). Cheers, Olly