<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Calibri Light";
panose-1:2 15 3 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-NZ link=blue vlink=purple style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>These look much better now Stacho.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>When there are no drawings, just maps that contain survey centrelines, the log is rather simplistic.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif'>############### export maps & scraps selection #################<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif'>S -.-- @ ()<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif'>########## end of export maps & scraps selection ###############<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal>I guess that is OK, but it would be nice to record centreline maps if possible.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>For a typical plan map however it looks like…<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif'>############### export maps & scraps selection #################<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif'>M <span style='background:yellow;mso-highlight:yellow'>771.64</span> DwarfsDoorPlanMap<span style='background:lime;mso-highlight:lime'>@</span> (Dwarf's Door Cave)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif'>M <span style='background:lime;mso-highlight:lime'>764.47</span> DwarfsD-K3-AbovePlan@DwarfsDoor (Dwarfs Door D-K3 plan)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif'>S 767.89 DwarfsD-K3-AbovePlan-s3@DwarfsDoor ()<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif'>S 764.14 DwarfsD-K3-AbovePlan-s2@DwarfsDoor ()<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif'>S 761.38 DwarfsD-K3-AbovePlan-s1@DwarfsDoor ()<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif'>M <span style='background:lime;mso-highlight:lime'>756.36</span> DE-DwarfEntPlan@DwarfsDoor (Dwarfs Door DE-Entrance plan)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif'>S 758.95 DE-DwarfEntPlan-s3@DwarfsDoor ()<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif'>S 756.09 DE-DwarfEntPlan-s2@DwarfsDoor ()<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif'>S 754.03 DE-DwarfEntPlan-s1@DwarfsDoor ()<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif'>…<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif'>S 655.11 DwarfsD-K4-DryPlan-s3@DwarfsDoor ()<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif'>S 649.25 DwarfsD-K4-DryPlan-s1@DwarfsDoor ()<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif'>S <span style='background:yellow;mso-highlight:yellow'>1429.78 @ ()</span><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif'>########## end of export maps & scraps selection ###############<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>The map numbers look a little odd. The map altitudes highlighted in green are composed of the three scraps below them, and by eye they look credible. I’m not sure about the numbers in yellow.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>The overall map in this example is composed of eight submaps and the reported altitude of 771.64 m is about 2 m above the highest passage. The map includes passage between 550 m and 769 m, and so by eye the average altitude reported should be 660 m.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>There is also the mystery of the unnamed scrap at 1429.78 m. I don’t know what it is referring to. The highest passage in the system is at 769 m.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Elevation maps and scraps are all reported with zero height, which I guess is OK. The original idea was to get a feeling for stacking order, which I guess might sometimes be a concern for elevations. Perhaps a way to report the stacking order would be to replace the real number used for plan scrap altitudes with an integer for elevation scrap stacking order (say zero or 1 is at the bottom). Just an idea, I don’t feel a particular need for it.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Thanks<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Bruce<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US>From:</span></b><span lang=EN-US> Therion <therion-bounces@speleo.sk> <b>On Behalf Of </b>Stacho Mudrak<br><b>Sent:</b> Sunday, 24 January 2021 08:15<br><b>To:</b> List for Therion users <therion@speleo.sk><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Therion] Map altitude NaN as -89999<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'>Hi Bruce, <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'>there is no problem calculating map altitude. It was not calculated, because it was not needed for map generation.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'>Added it in the latest commit.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'>S.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Sat, 23 Jan 2021 at 19:20, Bruce Mutton <<a href="mailto:bruce@tomo.co.nz" target="_blank">bruce@tomo.co.nz</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Hi Stacho<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>I mostly get -8999 etc for my maps (not near my computer so cannot be specific on the circumstances) especially where maps are composed of surveys rather than scraps. <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>I'm using Windows 10.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>I was a little perplexed that the map altitudes are undefined. Shouldn't the second level maps just be a weighted average of the component maps, scraps or surveys?<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>I will try the latest commit in a few days time. <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Bruce<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div id="gmail-m_-3314171294544385744gmail-m_-310193888522558873composer_signature"><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.5pt;color:#575757'>Sent from my Galaxy<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></blockquote></div></div></body></html>