feedback on 0.2.18

[Martin Budaj]

>> join fsceil1 at river:0 farsidewest3 at river:7
>
>
> That's actually a rather odd syntax don't you think? The syntax in thbook
> seems rather more sensible to me (with the smaller parts to the left).
> Thinking about it 0:fsceil1 at river would actually be the most logical, but
> somehow that doesn't seem as clear as fsceil1:0 at river


If we take 'fsceil1 at river' as a full-ID, then the current syntax means
<full-id>:<mark>, which is odd, but consistent -- isn't it?
Martin