1 - I tried to change the symbol-set option in the layout, but all of them (UIS, ASF, CCNP, SKBB) are the same for stalactite/stalagmite? like an "Y" and an inverted "Y"? I couldn't notice any change in symbols, just that the centreline was displayed for UIS. 2 - The names of the topo team. Are they sorted alphabetically according to the last name? Can I change this? thanks Carlos -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Carlos Henrique Grohmann - Guano Geologist M.Sc - Doctorate Student at IGc-USP - Brazil Linux User #89721 - carlos dot grohmann at gmail dot com +-----------------------------------------------------------+ _________________ "Good morning, doctors. I have taken the liberty of removing Windows 95 from my hard drive." --The winning entry in a "What were HAL's first words" contest judged by 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY creator Arthur C. Clarke
1 - I tried to change the symbol-set option in the layout, but all of them (UIS, ASF, CCNP, SKBB) are the same for stalactite/stalagmite? like an "Y" and an inverted "Y"? I couldn't notice any change in symbols, just that the centreline was displayed for UIS.
Currently, there are not too much different symbols defined. If you would like to use different symbols, you need to define them. It is not so complicated, if you would like to do it.
2 - The names of the topo team. Are they sorted alphabetically according to the last name? Can I change this?
Only in the case, when everybody surveyed same length of the cave. Otherwise people are sorted according to surveyed length. You can easily changed everything what is in the map header using simle TeX code in layout: code tex-map \def\topoteam{John Smith, Bill Smith, etc...} endcode See thbook page 56 for further things, that can be changed. S.
Hello everybody... I've got the following problem : I've made a survey (in a ptolemaic cistern, in Alexandria) and my plan is, on the sketch, in multiple parts : each time I've change the direction, I've made a new part, without any link (problem of angle between both parts, that I can't report precisely). How can I do ? I've tried to put every parts on the same scan and to precise for each the 2 survey points, but the result isn't very good... Do I have to join all parts (with the right angles...) before drawing it with the map editor ? Is there another way to do this ? Thank you very much Thierry
I've got the following problem : I've made a survey (in a ptolemaic cistern, in Alexandria) and my plan is, on the sketch, in multiple parts : each time I've change the direction, I've made a new part, without any link (problem of angle between both parts, that I can't report precisely). How can I do ?
I am not sure, I understand your problem correctly - may be a little image would help. But I will try. Original idea was - each part = one scrap. But in your case (and lot of other cases), it is a lot of work, especially adjusting those scraps to join each other correctly. And also our transformation generates extremly skewed maps in these cases.
I've tried to put every parts on the same scan and to precise for each the 2 survey points, but the result isn't very good... Do I have to join all parts (with the right angles...) before drawing it with the map editor ? Is there another way to do this ?
Last month, we are "intensively" working on this topic. We would like to add idea of registered sketches (Winkarst and Carto) to therion. It means, you will specify station coordinates on bitmaps and then these bitmaps will be morphed to match centerline data. Afterwards they will be shown on the map or in the map-editor to enable fast digitalization of these sketches. Would something like this solve your problem? S.
Stacho Mudrak a écrit :
I've got the following problem : I've made a survey (in a ptolemaic cistern, in Alexandria) and my plan is, on the sketch, in multiple parts : each time I've change the direction, I've made a new part, without any link (problem of angle between both parts, that I can't report precisely). How can I do ?
I am not sure, I understand your problem correctly - may be a little image would help. But I will try.
Original idea was - each part = one scrap. But in your case (and lot of other cases), it is a lot of work, especially adjusting those scraps to join each other correctly. And also our transformation generates extremly skewed maps in these cases.
OK !
I've tried to put every parts on the same scan and to precise for each the 2 survey points, but the result isn't very good... Do I have to join all parts (with the right angles...) before drawing it with the map editor ? Is there another way to do this ?
Last month, we are "intensively" working on this topic. We would like to add idea of registered sketches (Winkarst and Carto) to therion. It means, you will specify station coordinates on bitmaps and then these bitmaps will be morphed to match centerline data. Afterwards they will be shown on the map or in the map-editor to enable fast digitalization of these sketches. Would something like this solve your problem?
S.
I think that's exactly what will solve my problem and allow me to make perfect plans !! In fact, that's what I was doing with Illustrator after having made my "skeleton" in Toporobot before... But it will be much more precise this way !! I hope this function can be added easily (I'm not sure !!) Thank you very much.
_______________________________________________ Therion mailing list Therion@speleo.cz http://www.speleo.cz/mailman/listinfo/therion
On 22.6.2006, at 12:23, thierrygonon wrote:
my plan is, on the sketch, in multiple parts : each time I've change the direction, I've made a new part, without any link (problem of angle between both parts, that I can't report precisely). How can I do ?
You may make new scrap for each part of your sketch and join them together in therion. It will probably involve the editing of scraps for smooth joining. You may check the problems with parameter -layout- debug on in thconfig file. One trick - make all the crossing in one scrap - joins are better to do on smooth galery. Check wiki: http://wiki.speleo.cz/therion/doku.php? id=therion:faq#how_do_i_use_debug_mode_in_layout http://wiki.speleo.cz/therion/doku.php? id=therion:faq#how_do_i_join_three_scraps_in_a_y-shape Martin
participants (4)
-
Carlos \"Guâno\" Grohmann -
Martin Sluka -
Stacho Mudrak -
thierrygonon