And as for the Therion source I used to render these, it would have been whatever the current Windows executable was current at the date I put them onto the wiki (the wiki history should be able to tell you that). Not that I think it will make any difference between most recent builds of Therion. It was the differences in the PDF viewers which the renders illustrate, rather than differences in Therion builds. I would expect the current latest release of Therion renders exactly the same PDFs.

Footleg

On 15 December 2013 19:30, Bruce <bruce@tomo.co.nz> wrote:

http://therion.speleo.sk/wiki/doku.php/contrib:externalviewers#examples_of_r
> endering_differences_between_pdf_viewers and the commentary above it.

> Bruce - that's a very handy page. But it's missing the test therion
source you used to do the test. If you could add that, then others could
do other tests, on later versions, and on linux viewers, for example.

Wooky, I think those are Footleg's examples.

I put a complete sample dataset in
http://therion.speleo.sk/wiki/doku.php/examples#all_areas_all_symbol_sets
some time ago. An example attached.

It shows all areas (as at Nov 2012) overlaid with each other and various
lines and symbols in each of the symbol sets - and labelled as well. It
also indicates the drawing order.

It is messier than Footleg's example, but perhaps more comprehensive.

Bruce

_______________________________________________
Therion mailing list
Therion@speleo.sk
http://mailman.speleo.sk/mailman/listinfo/therion