Up until now I’ve been creating cross-section
scraps and inserting them within plan or elevation scraps using a statement like;
point 331.25 -43.0 section -scrap BX-Ent2PLANxs-24
This is how I think it is usually done(?)
It works fine most of the time, but sometimes the
density of passages is such that the cross-section needs to be on the far side
of the page, or maybe you prefer to group the cross-sections together in their
own little table. This makes including the cross-section insertion points
within plan or elevation scraps impractical I think.
Some time back there were discussions on this forum
about alternative ways of presenting cross-sections however I am not sure if
they were resolved.
Something in the Therion Book made me think this
might give interesting results.
So perhaps the result below is interesting, but I’m
not sure how I might develop it further into a means of presenting the
cross-sections where the sections are not plotted adjacent to the plan or
elevation of the passage.
The trouble is all the cross-section maps plot on top
of each other.
One way might be to export each cross-section one at
a time then have lots of map-image statements to add them to a final master map.
This would be a very messy th-config file.
Or would a plan scrap with no associated survey, and
lots of ‘point x y section –scrap <scrap>’ work?
Has anyone tried to layout cross-sections independent
of the passage without resorting to post processing?
Bruce
(Example below)
map BX-Ent2SectionsA \
-projection
none
BX-Ent2PLANxs-24
BX-Ent2PLANxs-94
endmap
map BX-Ent2SectionsB \
-projection
none
BX-Ent2PLANxs-36
BX-Ent2PLANxs-27
endmap
…
export map -projection none \
-layout
LayoutMapThisCave
\
-layout
LayoutMapThisCaveElev \
-layout-scale 1 100 \
-layout-scale-bar 10 m \
-output ../Outputs/CaveSections.pdf
