It looks there was a copy/paste error in the code :/ In the latest commit, it should be fixed I hope.

Could you please check it once again?

Thanks, S.

On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 19:08, Bruce Mutton <bruce@tomo.co.nz> wrote:

And another variation…

  • Start is OK
  • Right becomes LEFT
  • LEFT 6 to LEFT 5 is incorrect on two counts.  Looks like it should be RIGHT 2 then RIGHT 6 then BACK 2 then RIGHT 3 etc
  • Enumeration of the path stops at station 5, and misses legs 6 and 7

It seems the log of extend is not reflecting what is specified and what is actually produced.

Commenting out the last extend (# extend left 5 6) made no difference between these two example ‘log extend paths’.

Commenting station 5 (extend ignore 6 #5) is what triggers the significant difference in the two ‘log extend paths’.

 

Bruce

 

From: Therion <therion-bounces@speleo.sk> On Behalf Of Bruce Mutton
Sent: Thursday, 5 December 2019 06:52
To: 'List for Therion users' <therion@speleo.sk>
Subject: [Therion] log extend

 

> So, this feature has real promise, but I wonder if there is a bug, and now I am really interested how the extend specifications and logs compare in Tarquin’s short oxbow examples.

 

Initial look…

  • Start is OK.
  • Right becomes LEFT
  • Enumeration of the path stops at station 5, and misses legs 6 and 7

Bruce

_______________________________________________
Therion mailing list
Therion@speleo.sk
https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion