Return-Path: Received: from eurus1.inria.fr ([unix socket]) by imap-sop.inria.fr (Cyrus v2.2.12) with LMTPA; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:57:36 +0100 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Received: from mx2-sop.inria.fr (mx2-sop.inria.fr [138.96.0.92]) by eurus1.inria.fr (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.5) with ESMTP id m0OEva8F028972 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:57:36 +0100 Received: by mx2-sop.inria.fr (Postfix) id 5B6D48EA23; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:57:36 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: xavier.pennec@sophia.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by mx2-sop.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3E78E9D6; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:57:35 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah4FAJM2mEfUR4oUWmdsb2JhbACBV45DASCfAg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,244,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="8321571" Received: from texxarw.bm.gin.cz (HELO outsider.texxar.cz) ([212.71.138.20]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 24 Jan 2008 15:57:35 +0100 Received: from outsider2.texxar.cz (outsider.texxar.cz [212.71.138.20]) by outsider.texxar.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644C41C09A; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:57:34 +0100 (CET) X-Original-To: therion@speleo.sk Delivered-To: therion@outsider.texxar.cz X-Greylist: Passed host: 80.94.52.35 Received: from mail.atlantis.sk (mail.atlantis.sk [80.94.52.35]) by outsider.texxar.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B3181C067 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:57:32 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 19474 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jan 2008 14:57:34 -0000 Received: from fwinet01.nbs.sk (fwinet01.nbs.sk [193.87.130.3]) by mail.atlantis.sk (IMP) with HTTP for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:57:34 +0100 Message-ID: <1201186654.4798a75e88812@mail.atlantis.sk> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:57:34 +0100 From: Stacho Mudrak To: therion@speleo.sk References: <477E6D57.2070103@aliceadsl.fr> In-Reply-To: <477E6D57.2070103@aliceadsl.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 X-Originating-IP: 193.87.130.3 X-Sent-Via: webmail.atlantis.sk Subject: Re: [Therion] Problem in 3D model X-BeenThere: therion@speleo.sk X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: therion@speleo.sk List-Id: List for Therion users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: therion-bounces@speleo.sk Errors-To: therion-bounces@speleo.sk I am sorry for late answer, but sometimes it takes me a long time to get to the answers. I have tried the files you have submitted, but without success - I am not sure what is wrong on the image. OK, the interpretation of LRUD according to therion is following (we should probably put this into thbook): If passeges are horizontal (inclination < vthreshold, that can be set in centerline), LR is perpendicular to the shot and UD is vertical. If passages are more or less vertical (inclination > vthreshold), even UD becomes perpendicular to the shot - otherwise passages would not look very good. In the case of vertical (+- 90), UD is interpreted as north-south dimension from the station - to allow tube-like modelling of verticals. In your example - everything seems to me plotted correctly. Do I understand something wrong? Thanks, S. Quoting "Gilbert Fernandes (mailinglist)" : > Hello, > > I notice a bug in the 3D modeling. In this short exemple you can reproduce > the error. > The main problem is when you have a pit, ans so a vertical survey ( compas = > 90 or -90 ), the up and down value in survey data is used in the 3D model > (.lox file) for the with of the pit and not for the hight (or down) of the > galery. So pits are always as fat as they are hight. > Look the .th file and try to change the up and down value as comment in the > exemple, look the effect in the 3D view. > Thanks, > > Gilbert > > _______________________________________________ Therion mailing list Therion@speleo.sk http://www.speleo.sk/mailman/listinfo/therion