I notice that continuations listed in scraps with no meta data (ie no –attr code, -text or –explored  values) are not listed in continuation-list outputs.

For example, the code below gives a ? on a 2d map, but does not appear in the continuation-list. 

point 123.0 456.0 continuation

This is inconvenient if trying to keep track of them with continuation-list outputs.  Is it possible to have them included in the continuation-list output in due course?

Also I wonder if the object that contains the continuation definition could be listed, ie the scrap or survey (or file name), so that edits are easier to locate.

(At present the survey that identifies the physical location is listed – regardless of where it’s code is defined – and this is useful and should be retained)

Am using version 5.2.5

Regards

Bruce

PS: I notice that the problem with continuation text being repeated inappropriately has been solved thanks.