<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-NZ link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>Hello again<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I’m wondering why my area water displays at scale of 1:1000 but if I compile at 1:500 just one of the area waters does not display?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>The two water areas are both defined in the same scrap, which I have highlighted in yellow in one of the images.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>The areas are defined by three lines – a single horizontal line for the water surface and two curved lines to bound each of the areas.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>All lines and areas have -clip off set. When the lower curved lines have -visibility on, I can see they are there, but the area water still does not display.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Thinking that the label about the water supply might be somehow obscuring the area, I deleted it, but that had no effect<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Other area waters in the same compilation (indeed the same entire project) are OK as far as I know. Have never noticed behaviour like this before.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Therion 6.1.8<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Images below…<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><img width=663 height=185 style='width:6.9097in;height:1.9305in' id="Picture_x0020_1" src="cid:image002.png@01DA005D.A610D350"><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><img width=657 height=167 style='width:6.8402in;height:1.7361in' id="Picture_x0020_3" src="cid:image003.png@01DA005D.A610D350"><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I’ve checked the distortion with debug first and debug second, distortion looks OK, but there is no sign of the larger area.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><img width=659 height=207 style='width:6.8611in;height:2.1527in' id="Picture_x0020_4" src="cid:image008.png@01DA005D.A610D350"><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>With lower area water boundaries set to -visibility on…<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><img width=663 height=211 style='width:6.9027in;height:2.2013in' id="Picture_x0020_5" src="cid:image011.png@01DA005D.A610D350"><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I’m wondering if the morphing is shortening the top line at 1:1000 (making the area fail) but not at 1:500.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I don’t think this should happen, as I made the left-hand line points coincident, so both area boundary lines should join perfectly without a gap. It seems they do, as below.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><img width=280 height=213 style='width:2.9166in;height:2.2152in' id="Picture_x0020_6" src="cid:image014.png@01DA005D.A610D350"><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><img width=644 height=186 style='width:6.7083in;height:1.9375in' id="Picture_x0020_7" src="cid:image018.png@01DA005D.A610D350"><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>So any ideas as to why visibility of one of the area waters in this project should be scale dependant?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Thanks<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Bruce<o:p></o:p></p></div></body></html>